Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Ji Hyun Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Neurology
Predisposing Hemodynamic Factors Associated with a Failed Apnea Test during Brain Death Determination
Eun Young Kim, Ji Hyun Kim
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2016;31(3):236-242.   Published online August 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2016.00332
  • 6,652 View
  • 123 Download
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
The apnea test is an essential component in the clinical determination of brain death, however it may incur a significant risk of complications such as hypotension, hypoxia and even cardiac arrest. We analyzed the risk factors associated with a failed apnea test during brain death assessment in order to predict and avoid these adverse events.
Methods
Medical records on apnea tests performed for brain-dead donors at our institution between January 2009 and January 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Age, gender, etiology of brain death, use of catecholamines and results of arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA), systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP), mean arterial pressure and central venous pressure prior to apnea test initiation were collected as variables. A-a gradient and PaO2/FiO2 were calculated for more precise assessment of the respiratory system. In total, 267 cases were divided into two groups based on those who completed the apnea test and those who failed the test.
Results
13 cases failed the apnea test. Among them, seven cases failed due to severe hypotension (SBP < 60 mmHg) and the others failed due to refractory hypoxia. In terms of hemodynamic state, SBP was significantly higher in the completed test group than the failed group (126.5 ± 23.9 vs. 103 ± 15.2, respectively; p = 0.001). In ABGA, the completed test group showed significantly higher PaO2/ FiO2 (313.6 ± 229.8 vs. 141.5 ± 131.0, respectively; p = 0.008) and a lower A-a gradient (278.2 ± 209.5 vs. 506.2 ± 173.1, respectively; p = 0.000). In multivariable analysis, low SBP (p = 0.003) and high A-a gradient (p = 0.044) were independent risk factors associated with a failed apnea test.
Conclusions
Although the unexpected adverse events during the apnea test for brain death determination do not occur frequently, they can be fatal. If a brain-dead patient has low SBP and a high A-a gradient, clinicians should pay more attention and prepare for potential complications prior to the apnea test.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Identification of Hemodynamic Risk Factors for Apnea Test Failure During Brain Death Determination
    Jin Joo Kim, Eun Young Kim
    Transplantation Proceedings.2019; 51(6): 1655.     CrossRef
  • Reduction of Apnea Test Time in an Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-Dependent Potential Donor
    Hyeon Sook Jee, Sora Cha, Gaab Soo Kim
    Korean Journal of Transplantation.2017; 31(1): 49.     CrossRef
Review
Pharmacology
Assessment and Treatment of Pain in Adult Intensive Care Unit Patients
Jun Mo Park, Ji Hyun Kim
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(3):147-159.   Published online August 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.3.147
  • 17,980 View
  • 693 Download
  • 3 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
In most cases, patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) have suffered from severe trauma, undergone major surgery or been treated for a serious medical illness. Although they often experience more intense pain than general ward patients, they are frequently unable to communicate their experiences to health care providers, thus preventing accurate assessment and treatment of their pain. If appropriate measures are not taken to treat pain in critically ill patients, stress response or sympathetic overstimulation can lead to complications. The short-term consequences of untreated pain include higher energy expenditure and immunomodulation. Longer-term, untreated pain increases the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder. Because pain is quite subjective, the accurate assessment of pain is very difficult in the patients with impaired communication ability. The current most valid and reliable behavioral pain scales used to assess pain in adult ICU patients are the Behavioral Pain Scale and the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool. Once pain has been accurately assessed using these methods, various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies should be performed by the multidisciplinary care team. Accurate assessment and proper treatment of pain in adult ICU patients will improve patients outcome, which reduces the stress response and decreases the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Nurses’ knowledge, practice, and associated factors of pain assessment in critically ill adult patients at public hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
    Temesgen Ayenew, Berhanu Melaku, Mihretie Gedfew, Haile Amha, Keralem Anteneh Bishaw
    International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.2021; 15: 100361.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Pain Management Algorithm on Pain Intensity of Patients with Loss of Consciousness Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Trial
    Zahra Dehghani, Asadollah Keikhaei, Fariba Yaghoubinia, Aliakbar Keykha, Masoom Khoshfetrat
    Medical - Surgical Nursing Journal.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ignorance may be Bliss (for Intensivists), but not for ICU Patients!
    Atul P. Kulkarni, Sumitra G Bakshi
    Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2019; 23(4): 161.     CrossRef

ACC : Acute and Critical Care